This has fallen slightly from 26 per , in the early s, with even greater declines in some countries in the US, rates have fallen from 47 to 34 per , The death rate from stomach cancer has fallen substantially — from 19 per , in to 11 per , in — and contributed to much of the slow global progress against cancer mortality.
In some cases we have seen dramatic declines over the last few decades. For some, such as stomach cancer there has been notable progress — declining from 19 to 11 deaths per , The number of cancer deaths has increased from around 5.
As we just saw, this is happening for two big reasons: The first one is that the world population is increasing and with it the number of annual deaths. In 49 Million people died and since then the number of total deaths has increased by more than 7 Million — as this chart shows. The second big reason is that the world made rapid progress against causes of death that once killed people early in life — especially infectious diseases. Because the world is getting richer and fewer are dying an early death we can expect the number of people dying from cancer to increase further.
This chart shows death rates from lung cancer in men in the US and Spain since It is possible to add many more countries to this chart. In many countries we see a significant rise, peak and then decline in lung cancer death rates in the 20th century.
In the United States, the death rate peaked in the s in men. In Spain this peak was later, only in the s. These trends are driven by the trends in smoking.
The other chart shows the sales of cigarettes per person. Smoking is the biggest risk factor for lung cancer and we see that the trends in lung cancer follow those in smoking with a lag of around 20 years.
In 7 Million people globally died a premature death because of smoking. The fact that smoking causes lung cancer is the major reason for the high death toll of smoking.
It is possible to add the data to lung cancer in women in the US to this chart. In the US it was once much more common for men to smoke so that the peaks of lung cancer for men are much higher. Smoking became more common for women only later so that lung cancer death rates for women peaked later.
The world map shows the Global Burden of Disease estimates of the share of cancer deaths that can be attributed to smoking.
In poor countries, where fewer people were smoking in the past, tobacco is responsible for a much smaller faction of cancer deaths. This charts provides a long run perspective on cancer death rates, from in the United States. Global cancer deaths are rising : in 5. To understand what is happening we therefore have to correct for the population increase and ask for the rate — the number of deaths per , people — and we have to adjust for ageing.
When we compare these metrics shown here we see that age-standardized cancer death rates are falling globally. Death rates which correct for ageing show a 17 percent decline from to Why are cancer death rates falling? One hypothesis is that cancer prevalence is falling i.
Is this true? Globally, no. The share of people with cancer even when corrected for ageing has been slowly increasing in recent decades. Global cancer prevalence has risen from 0. In some countries — the US, for example — the age-corrected prevalence has been fairly constant in recent decades with the rate of new cases actually falling.
If death rates are falling but prevalence is rising or constant, then it must be the case that people with cancer have better or longer survival rates. We see this clearly in the USA when we look at the change in five-year survival rates across cancer types.
This is shown in the chart as the change from to Here we see that on aggregate five-year survival rates for all cancers increased from But we also see significant differences not only in start or end survival rates, but the change over time. Prostate cancer has close to 99 percent five-year survival, but has also seen major progress from a rate of 69 percent in the s. In contrast, pancreas has low five-year survival rates at 8.
Defining the exact attribution of each is difficult, and varies depending on cancer type. But there have been some studies which have attempted to do so. Scott Alexander published a very good overview of the relative impact of detection versus treatment here.
One way to test whether survival rates only increased from early diagnosis is to look at how survival has changed for each stage of cancer: if detection was the only improvement then we would see no increase in survival rates in later cancer stages. National cancer statistics published by the US government show increases in survival rate within all stages from very early to late-stage. Other studies focused on specific cancer types show similar results.
Tumours have gotten smaller in recent decades — the result of earlier detection. Studies have shown that this can account for a significant share of survival improvements: one study attributed early detection as 61 percent and 28 percent of improved survival in localized-stage and regional-stage breast cancer, respectively 7 But even when correcting for size and early detection, we have seen improvements. Progress here is important for many.
Interactive chart: The same data shown in the chart can be viewed and downloaded in this interactive here. Cancer survival rates in the US by race can be seen here. In this charts, we provide the widest coverage across countries of five-year survival rates by cancer type.
This data was published in the The Lancet in by Allemani et al. The three maps below show how the five-year survival rates for lung, breast and liver cancer vary across the world. This data is again from Allemani et al. In breast cancer, higher income countries in particular across North America, Europe and Oceania tend to have five-year survival rates over 80 percent in This is almost double that of the lowest nation with available data in — Jordan — at only 43 percent.
Compared to breast cancer the five year survival rates for liver cancer are much lower around he world. The lowest survival rate in was in Romania with just 2. In these two charts we see that the five-year survival rates — following diagnosis — are lower in poorer countries. Especially for breast cancer survival rates are lower in poorer countries.
The relationship between lung cancer survival rate and average is less strong. There is significant variability in five-year survival rates between countries of a similar income, but the lowest survival rates are again reported from the poorest countries. Are cancers caused by genetic factors, or determined by external factors such as behavioral, lifestyle and environmental exposure?
The relative contribution of genetic factors DNA replication and tissue type versus external exposure has been a dominant topic within cancer research. The outcomes of such studies are highly important — if genetic factors are found to be dominant then early detection and understanding of the relative vulnerability of different DNA and tissue variations arguably present the best opportunity to reduce cancer burden.
In contrast, if external and environmental risk factors dominate, then lifestyle choice which reduces risk exposure is crucial for this reduction. This study therefore argued that, beyond some cancer types which are deterministic D-tumors and can be reduced through lifestyle factors or vaccines , the most promising approach to reduction of cancer deaths across most cancers replicative, R-tumors is early detection.
This paper has been highly contest within the scientific literature. A number of later publications in Science provided a rebuttal to these conclusions, suggesting analytical flaws in the prior analysis, and epidemiological evidence which suggests otherwise. Wu et al. The Global Burden of Disease GBD study attempt — using risk-exposure relationships — to provide attribution of certain risk factors to disease burden and mortality outcomes.
In the chart we see IHME estimates of the share of global cancer deaths which are attributed to one of these major risk factors. For example, 84 percent of tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer deaths are attributed to risk factors such as smoking and air pollution. Alcoholic drinks.
Cancer types. Bladder cancer. Breast cancer. Breast cancer survivors. Cervical cancer. Colorectal cancer. About our Cancer Prevention Recommendations. Be a healthy weight. Be physically active. Eat wholegrains, vegetables, fruit and beans. Limit 'fast foods'. Cancer trends. Deaths from cancer worldwide, Cancer cases linked to exposure to tobacco smoke, worldwide. Incidence worldwide. There were 17 million new cases of cancer worldwide in The four most common cancers occurring worldwide are lung, female breast, bowel and prostate cancer.
These four account for more than four in ten of all cancers diagnosed worldwide. Worldwide there will be UK incidence is ranked higher than two-thirds of Europe. Mortality worldwide. There were 9. Lung, liver, stomach, and bowel are the most common causes of cancer death worldwide, accounting for more than four in ten of all cancer deaths. Lung, liver, stomach and bowel cancers have been the four most common causes of cancer death since UK mortality is ranked lower than two-thirds of Europe.
UK mortality is ranked higher than two-thirds of the world. Risk factors worldwide. Cancer risk factors are overall similar worldwide.
0コメント